<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tony Connor &#187; Food Labelling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tonyconnor.com/category/food-labelling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tonyconnor.com</link>
	<description>Quality Management System Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 05:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Latest UK Recalls include Cookies, Chocolate &amp; Ravioli</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3402/latest-uk-recalls-cookies-chocolate-ravioli/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3402/latest-uk-recalls-cookies-chocolate-ravioli/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 05:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Manning Impex Ltd withdraws one batch of Buenas brand Macapuno String Coconut Sport in Syrup due to the undeclared presence of sulphur dioxide &#8211; Monday 2 April 2012 Macapuno String, Coconut Sport in Syrup, 340g Risk: A single batch of the above product has been found to contain undeclared sulphur dioxide. This makes the product [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3402/latest-uk-recalls-cookies-chocolate-ravioli/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controls for desinewed meat enforced on UK by EU will cause &#8216;criminal waste&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3400/controls-for-desinewed-meat-enforced-on-uk-by-eu/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3400/controls-for-desinewed-meat-enforced-on-uk-by-eu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 04:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UK has been required to re-classify the process by which a very small part of its meat processing industry removes meat from animal bones. The European Commission has asked that a moratorium is put in place on the production of &#8216;desinewed meat&#8217; (DSM) from cattle, sheep and goats. Desinewed meat is produced using a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3400/controls-for-desinewed-meat-enforced-on-uk-by-eu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Food Standards Agency allergy advice on Chapelle des Bois &#8211; 2009 Ac Fleurie wine</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3267/food-standards-agency-allergy-advice-on-chapelle-des-bois-2009-ac-fleurie-wine/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3267/food-standards-agency-allergy-advice-on-chapelle-des-bois-2009-ac-fleurie-wine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 07:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The FSA is aware of an issue with undeclared sulphites in Chapelle des Bois &#8211; 2009 Ac Fleurie wine. The label does not specify that the wine contains sulphites. Halewood International has re-labelled the majority of bottles, but a small number of bottles have been placed on the market without the additional information. If you&#8217;re [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3267/food-standards-agency-allergy-advice-on-chapelle-des-bois-2009-ac-fleurie-wine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Eggs okay if cooked after best before date&#8217; &#8211; FSA</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3278/eggs-okay-if-cooked-after-best-before-date-fsa/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3278/eggs-okay-if-cooked-after-best-before-date-fsa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 07:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As part of a drive to cut food waste, the Food Standards Agency has revised its advice on using eggs after their ‘best before’ date. The advice now is that, providing the eggs are cooked thoroughly, they can be eaten a day or two after their ‘best before’ date. Previously, the advice was that eggs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3278/eggs-okay-if-cooked-after-best-before-date-fsa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest FSA e-News available online</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3120/latest-fsa-e-news-available-online-2/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3120/latest-fsa-e-news-available-online-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Oct 2011 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The October edition of FSA e-News is a meaty issue. It includes a report on Agency plans to charge for meat official controls. An updated assessment of the impact of these proposals has recently been sent to the independent Regulatory Policy Committee, and the Agency awaits its opinion. Also featured is the review the Agency [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3120/latest-fsa-e-news-available-online-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSA publishes pros and cons of GM</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/3063/fsa-publishes-pros-and-cons-of-gm/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/3063/fsa-publishes-pros-and-cons-of-gm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 04:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=3063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food Standards Agency has served up some food for thought by publishing information about GM foods, along with the views of a wide cross-section of interested parties, in the pages of its quarterly magazine Bite. The publication follows the Government’s announcement of five key principles for considering GM in the UK. The principles emphasise [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/3063/fsa-publishes-pros-and-cons-of-gm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FSA call for a survey of Allergen Labelling</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/2942/fsa-call-for-a-survey-of-allergen-labelling/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/2942/fsa-call-for-a-survey-of-allergen-labelling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 05:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety Improvement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=2942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Food Standards Agency is inviting researchers to carry out a survey of allergen advisory labelling to provide a better understanding of whether the labelling relates to the actual level of allergen present in processed foods. It will also help the FSA gather information on the levels of allergens present as a result of cross-contamination. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/2942/fsa-call-for-a-survey-of-allergen-labelling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marks &amp; Spencer withdraws Roast Potatoes due to incorrect allergen information</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/2940/marks-spencer-withdraws-roast-potatoes-due-to-incorrect-allergen-information/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/2940/marks-spencer-withdraws-roast-potatoes-due-to-incorrect-allergen-information/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 05:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Quality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=2940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marks &#038; Spencer has withdrawn 2 date codes of Marks &#038; Spencer Roast Potatoes due to a packaging error resulting in incorrect allergen information Allergens: Gluten/Wheat and Milk Product:Marks &#038; Spencer Roast Potatoes Risk:The above product contains gluten from wheat and milk, which have been omitted from the label. Therefore, this is a potential health [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/2940/marks-spencer-withdraws-roast-potatoes-due-to-incorrect-allergen-information/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gluten Free Icon Error on Onken Wholegrain Yoghurt</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/2954/gluten-free-icon-error-on-onken-wholegrain-yoghurt/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/2954/gluten-free-icon-error-on-onken-wholegrain-yoghurt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=2954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some pots of Onken’s strawberry, peach and summer berries wholegrain yoghurts incorrectly include a gluten-free icon on the packaging. These yoghurts contain wholegrains, such as barley, rye, oats and wheat, and are therefore not gluten-free. However, it is clear from the ingredients list and allergen warning that they contain gluten. New packing is being printed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/2954/gluten-free-icon-error-on-onken-wholegrain-yoghurt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USDA Announces Proposed Rule to Better Label Raw Meat and Poultry Containing Added Solutions</title>
		<link>http://tonyconnor.com/2717/usda-announces-proposed-rule-to-better-label-raw-meat-and-poultry-containing-added-solutions/</link>
		<comments>http://tonyconnor.com/2717/usda-announces-proposed-rule-to-better-label-raw-meat-and-poultry-containing-added-solutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Food Labelling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tonyconnor.com/?p=2717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Department of Agriculture&#8217;s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) is proposing a new rule to establish common, easy-to-understand names for raw meat and poultry products that include injections, marinades, or have otherwise incorporated added solutions which may not be visible to the consumer. FSIS has determined that some labels do not clearly [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tonyconnor.com/2717/usda-announces-proposed-rule-to-better-label-raw-meat-and-poultry-containing-added-solutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

