Welcome to my website

I have 20 years of experience in Quality Management, and became a qualified Quality Management System Auditor in 1994. I've also been writing ISO 9001 compliant Quality Manuals and extensive Food Safety HACCP Manuals and Systems for 15 years.

I have a wealth of management experience and practical use of Quality Management Systems in the food industry.

FSMA Claim ‘Significant Progress’ in One-Year Report

Since President Obama signed the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) on January 4, 2011, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made significant progress in developing proposed rules to implement the sweeping food safety reform law, publishing mandated reports, and taking important steps toward increasing overall food safety capacity in the United States. Below are brief summaries of what FDA has accomplished to date.

Highlights
Issued interim final rules on criteria for administrative detention and used this authority three times; issued interim final rules on prior notice of imported food.
Issued guidance to the seafood industry on food safety hazards and to the dietary supplement industry regarding new dietary ingredients.
Conducted extensive domestic and foreign outreach to all stakeholders to receive input in developing the proposed preventive control rules.
Established the Produce Safety Alliance and the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance.
Met the FSMA mandate for foreign food safety inspections, and is well on its way to meeting the 5-year inspection frequency mandate for high-risk domestic food facilities.
Continued to build State-Federal and global partnerships.

Initial Steps in FSMA Implementation Completed
During the first year of FSMA, FDA has completed a number initial implementation steps, including:
Consumer-Friendly Web Search for Recalls. FDA launched a more consumer- friendly recall search engine on the FDA website.
Guidance to Seafood Industry on Food Safety Hazards. FDA issued its updated guide to the seafood industry on hazards associated with fish and fishery products and appropriate controls for those hazards.
Administrative Detention of Foods. Allows FDA to administratively detain food products that it has reason to believe are adulterated or misbranded for up to 30 days, if needed. FDA has begun using this authority.
Prior Notice of Imported Food. FDA issued an interim final rule that requires a person submitting prior notice of imported food, including food for animals, to report the name of any country to which the article has been refused entry.
Joint Anti-Smuggling Strategy. FDA and the Department of Homeland Security issued a joint anti-smuggling strategy to help to identify and prevent smuggled foods from entering the U.S. and posing a threat to national security and consumer safety.
Fee Schedule. FDA announced the fiscal year 2012 fee schedule for certain domestic and foreign facility reinspections and for failure to comply with recall orders.
Authority to Suspend the Registration of Food Facilities. FDA has the authority to suspend the registration of food facilities to prevent the import and export into the U.S. in certain circumstances involving food that has a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.
Product Tracing Pilots Launched. FDA announced that the Institute of Food Technologists (IFT) will carry out two new pilot projects aimed at enhancing the agency’s and industry’s ability to trace products responsible for foodborne illness outbreaks.

Inspections
FDA has met the FSMA mandate for foreign inspections. For domestic inspections, the FSMA mandate is based on a 5-year time period. In the past year, FDA has defined its high risk and non high risk domestic food facility inventories and in FY11, FDA and its State partners conducted more than 20,000 food facility inspections. At this rate the Agency will most assuredly meet the domestic food inspection frequency mandates defined in FSMA. In addition, FDA is developing new risk-based approaches to domestic inspection to maximize public health benefit.

Outreach and Technical Assistance
Communication and outreach have played an essential role as FDA implements the various FSMA provisions.
FDA has participated in more than 350 meetings with industry leaders, farmers, consumers, public officials, and academics.
On produce safety, FDA has worked very closely with USDA, which has an established relationship with farmers, and taken part in 14 farm tours across the country to gather input on how the proposed rules can work feasibly across the diversity of commodities and growing conditions and practices.
FDA, the US Department of Agriculture, and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture entered into an agreement to collaborate on the establishment of a competitive grant program for food safety training and other projects.
FDA held three public meetings on preventive controls, import provisions, and changes to inspection and compliance programs in a preventive controls environment.
FDA has participated in more than 70 meetings globally to discuss the international impact of FSMA. This includes trips by the Deputy Commissioner for Foods to China, Mexico, Canada and the European Union.
FDA participated in, and helped fund, the establishment of the Produce Safety Alliance and the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance to help industry, especially small and very small firms, to comply with the requirements.
FDA provided information to the business community through the extension services of 49 land-grant colleges and universities.
FDA established a FSMA webpage that now has more than 10,000 subscribers, includes more than 100 Frequently Asked Questions by topic, and features videos, webinars, presentations, and print materials.

FSMA Reports to Congress
FDA submitted to Congress the first annual “Report on Food Facilities, Food Imports, and FDA Foreign Offices” and the “Biennial Report to Congress on the Food Emergency Response Network (FERN).”
Source FDA here

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report
  • services sprite FSMA Claim Significant Progress in One Year Report

Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling

Waitrose is withdrawing its own brand Essential Salmon and Dill Fishcakes because of incorrect allergy labelling. The fishcakes contain mustard, which isn’t mentioned on the label. If you’re allergic to or intolerant of mustard, you’re advised not to eat this product. The Food Standards Agency has issued an Allergy Alert.

The product being withdrawn is:
Waitrose Essential Salmon and Dill Fishcakes, 170g All date codes
Waitrose has withdrawn the product, and contacted the relevant allergy support organisations, which will inform their members. Customer notices will be displayed in stores, explaining why the product is being recalled.
If you’ve bought the product, you can return it to the store for a full refund.
No other Waitrose products are affected.
Waitrose withdraws their own Essential Range of Salmon and Dill Fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
Source FSA here

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling
  • services sprite Waitrose withdraws salmon and dill fishcakes due to incorrect allergen labelling

Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third-party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems

Today Democratic Members of the Energy and Commerce Committee sent a letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third-party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems. The letter’s findings are based on the Committee’s bipartisan investigation of the Listeria monocytogenes outbreak in cantaloupe from Jensen Farms.

The investigation release today reveals some of the reasons why the auditing system failed in the recent outbreak:
•Auditors’ findings were not based on the practices of the best farms and failed to ensure that the producer met FDA guidance;
•The auditors missed or failed to prioritize import food safety deficiencies;
•The auditors lacked any regulatory authority and did not report identified problems to the FDA or other state or federal authorities;
•The auditors did not ensure that identified problems were resolved; the auditors provided advance notice of site visits and spent only a short period of time on-site; and
•Auditors had multiple conflicts of interest.

Energy and Commerce Committee Ranking Member Henry A. Waxman, Subcommittee Ranking Members Diana DeGette and Frank Pallone, and the author of the Food Safety Modernization Act, Rep. John D. Dingell, urged the FDA to closely review the new information uncovered by the Committee. They state, “Like it or not, our food safety system relies heavily on third-party auditors to identify dangerous practices and prevent contaminated foods from reaching the market. We believe reforms in third-party audits are essential. We call on you to address the problems identified in this investigation in regulation

The full text of the letter is available online at source House Committee on Energy and Commerce here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems
  • services sprite Letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg identifying problems with third party food safety audits and asking FDA to take action to address these problems

Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms

Overview
The Energy and Commerce Committee has conducted a bipartisan investigation of the recent outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in cantaloupes grown and processed at Jensen Farms, a family-owned operation in Granada, Colorado. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 146 people in 28 states have been infected, 30 people have died, and one person has miscarried as a result of this outbreak. It was the deadliest foodborne illness outbreak in over 25 years. As part of its investigation into this outbreak, the Committee has obtained documents from and conducted interviews of high-ranking officials at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Jensen Farms, Primus Labs and Bio Food Safety (the third-party auditor that inspected Jensen Farms before the outbreak occurred), and Frontera Produce (the sole distributor of the cantaloupes).
The purpose of this staff report is to provide facts gathered during the course of the Committee’s investigation and to provide information helpful to the FDA, state authorities, growers, distributors, and others to better protect the nation’s food supply.
The Listeria outbreak began in late summer 2011. On September 2, 2011 the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment notified CDC of seven recent cases involving individuals who had eaten cantaloupe before becoming ill. As part of the investigation of these outbreaks, FDA visited and inspected the Jensen Farms facility on September 10, and on September 22, and 23, 2011.
During its unannounced visit on September 10, FDA took 39 samples from throughout the facility, finding that 13 of these samples contained Listeria contamination. During its announced second visit, with the knowledge of the positive samples, the FDA team conducted an environmental assessment to identify the factors that led to the introduction, growth, or spread of the Listeria contamination. FDA identified multiple potential problems during this investigation. These included the lack of a pre-cooling step to remove field heat before the cantaloupes were moved into cold storage; the inability to easily clean the packing facility floor and packing equipment; facility design flaws that allowed water to collect in proximity to equipment and employees walkways; and washing and drying equipment that was originally used on a different
agricultural commodity. On October 18, 2011, the FDA issued a warning letter to Jensen Farms in relation to these findings.

Staff Briefings with FDA
Committee staff met with FDA and CDC officials on October 19, 2011, and again with FDA officials on December 8, 2011.3 FDA officials summarized the agency’s investigation of the Listeria outbreak and efforts to prevent future outbreaks. The investigation conclusively linked the outbreak to cantaloupes grown at Jensen Farms, including 13 positive samples of Listeria monocytogenes obtained from processing equipment and cantaloupes in a Jensen Farms packing facility. FDA officials cited several deficiencies in Jensen Farms’ facility, which reflected a general lack of awareness of food safety principles and may have contributed to the outbreak, including:
• Condensation from cooling systems draining directly onto the floor,
• Poor drainage resulting in water pooling around the food processing equipment,
• Inappropriate food processing equipment which was difficult to clean (i.e., Listeria found on the felt roller brushes),
• No antimicrobial solution, such as chlorine, in the water used to wash the cantaloupes, and
• No equipment to remove field heat from the cantaloupes before they were placed into cold storage.

FDA officials were highly critical of the processing methods used at Jensen Farms. According to these FDA officials, the probable causes of the melon contamination at Jensen Farms included “serious design flaws” in the processing technique used at Jensen Farms, “poor sanitary design of the facility itself,” and “lack of awareness of food safety standards by Jensen Farms.” In particular, FDA emphasized to Committee staff that the processing equipment and the decision not to chlorinate the water used to wash the cantaloupes were two probable causes of the contamination. Both of these significant factors were changes implemented at the packing facility after the 2010 audit.
While this is the first Listeria outbreak linked to a raw agricultural commodity, the risks identified by FDA at the Jensen Farms packing facility were not new or unknown. In fact, the FDA classifies fresh produce generally as a “high risk” product for purposes of inspection priority under the Food Safety Modernization Act signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011. In addition, in July 2009, the FDA released draft guidance to the industry to minimize the risk of foodborne illness from melon production and distribution. FDA officials stated that the outbreak could have likely been prevented if Jensen Farms had maintained its facilities in accordance with existing FDA guidance. FDA emphasized that the operating firm is responsible for adhering to FDA standards, comprised of four steps: hazard analysis; development of a preventative plan; validation; and verification.

Staff Briefing with Jensen Farms
Committee staff met with Eric and Ryan Jensen, the current owners of Jensen Farms, on November 8, 2011. Jensen Farms has been in operation for several generations and has grown and packaged cantaloupes for the past twenty years. Eric and Ryan Jensen inherited the farm from their father, who recently passed away. Prior to the Listeria outbreak, Jensen Farms had no reported food safety problems.
Jensen Farms has had a business relationship with Frontera Produce for almost a decade. In 2003, Frontera Produce began distributing the farm’s onions. Later, in addition to the onions, Frontera Produce began distributing Jensen Farms’ cantaloupes to major retailers throughout the country. Most large retail purchasers of produce, including those to whom Jensen Farms sold their goods, require third-party audits of its growers and producers. One of Jensen Farms’ large retail purchasers provided Frontera Produce with a list of roughly ten acceptable auditors. Frontera Produce shared this list with Jensen Farms and, from this list, Jensen Farms contracted with Primus Labs.
Primus Labs has audited Jensen Farms during the course of Jensen Farms’ relationship with Frontera Produce. Primus Labs hired a subcontractor, Bio Food Safety, Inc., to conduct its recent audits of Jensen Farms. On August 5, 2010, Jerry Walzel, the President of Bio Food Safety, audited the Jensen Farms packing facility and gave it a 95% grade – a “superior” rating,
despite finding several major and minor deficiencies. On precaution that Jensen Farms took in 2010, which it dropped in 2011, was to use an antimicrobial solution, such as chlorine, in the cantaloupe wash water. The front page of the August 2010 audit stated, “this facility packs fresh cantaloupes from their own fields into cartons. The melons are washed and then run through a hydro cooler which has chlorine added to the water. Once the product is dried and packed into cartons it is placed into coolers.”
After the August 2010 audit was completed, one of the Jensen brothers informed Mr. Walzel that they were interested in improving their processes. According to Jensen Farms, in response to this inquiry, Mr. Walzel indicated that they should consider new equipment to replace the hydrocooler the farm used to process cantaloupe. Mr. Walzel stated that the hydrocooler, with its recirculating water, was a potential food safety “hotspot,” and advised them to consider alternate equipment. Based on his comments, and input from a local equipmentbroker, Jensen Farms purchased and retrofitted equipment previously used to process potatoes.
The Jenson brothers stated that they changed from the hydrocooler to the new food processing equipment in an attempt to strengthen their food safety efforts.
One of the FDA officials who briefed Committee staff had previously served as a third-party auditor. He stated that it was an inherent conflict of interest for an auditor to provide advice like the kind provided by Mr. Walzel to Jensen Farms. He noted that operators should seek such advice from independent consultants, not auditors. Jensen Farms stated that they contracted with Primus Labs to perform an audit in July 2011. Again, Primus Labs subcontracted with Bio Food Safety to conduct the audit. Mr. Walzel did not conduct this audit; a new auditor from Bio Food Safety, James Dilorio, conducted the audit on July 25, 2011, and, after spending approximately four hours inspecting the facility, gave Jensen Farms a 96% grade – again a “superior” rating. Despite this high rating, Mr. Dilorio identified several deficiencies, including three “major deficiencies”: (1) wood (which can house bacteria and cause splinters) covered the unloading and packing tables, (2) lack of hot water at hand washing stations, and (3) doors left open during operating hours, potentially allowing pests to enter the facility. Dilorio also identified three “minor deficiencies”: the storage area was left open during operating hours; there were no records of corrective actions taken based on previous audits; and stickers on pest control devices were in the wrong location. Five additional instances of “non-compliance” at the facility were also identified.
The auditor noted on the front page of the audit that Jensen Farms did not use an anti- microbial wash in 2011, writing, “This is a packing facility for cantaloupes which are washed by a spraybar roller system, graded, sorted by size, packed into cartons and stored in dry coolers.
No anti-microbial solution is injected into the water of the wash station.” According to FDA, the failure to use an anti-microbial wash was not consistent with agency guidance and was a probable cause of the contamination. Jensen Farms noted that it received a visit from a representative of Frontera Produce, its distributor, shortly before the 2011 audit. According to the Jensen brothers, this representative provided them with advice about preparing for the audit, but did not note any problems. Jensen Farms informed Committee staff that quality control representatives from various retailers have visited the farm as well. The Jensen brothers stated that based on these inspections and their prior food safety record, they had no concerns about their operations prior to the recent outbreak.

Staff Briefing with Frontera Produce
Committee staff met with representatives of Frontera Produce on November 18, 2011. Will Steele and Amy Gates, the CEO and Executive Vice President of Frontera Produce, told Committee staff that they had visited Jensen Farms to inspect its facilities and provide business advice. Mr. Steele indicated that he had been to the farm approximately six times in the past six years, but not in the past two years. Ms. Gates visited Jensen Farms shortly before its July 2011 audit. She stated that, due to the nature of their business relationship, she focused on Jensen Farms’ documentation, noting that the primary concern is the formatting of shipment records.
In 2011, Primus found the following non-compliances: there were no written procedures for calibrating thermometers, there were no background checks were conducted on personnel, there were no records of food security training for employees, there was no certificate of inspection of the backflow prevention system for water lines, and employees were not required to sign documents promising to comply with Jensen Farms’ hygiene, health, and occupational safety policies.
Mr. Steele and Ms. Gates said that many major retailers require that growers obtain annual audits from third-party auditors such as Primus Labs. They stated that if a buyer identifies deficiencies that they want rectified, Frontera Produce will communicate those concerns to the grower or producer in question. They could not recall, however, a situation in which a grower gets a passing grade on an audit and the buyer asks them to “go back and fix things.”
Frontera Produce incurred significant costs from the recall. According to a Frontera Produce representative, as of December 12, 2011, it has received direct bills and invoice adjustments totaling approximately $500,000 for recall-related costs incurred by customers who purchased Jensen Farms cantaloupe through Frontera Produce. When questioned, both Mr. Steele and Ms. Gates were critical of the current standards for third-party audits and had concerns about inadequate standards. Ms. Gates indicated that there is “no industry standard for validation points” after an audit, while Mr. Steele stated that “this is the industry standard. I’ve always believed there’s got to be more validation points. This case clearly demonstrates that.”
Ms. Gates stated that Frontera Produce is currently working with NSF International and other firms to improve the audit system.

Staff Briefing with Primus Labs
Committee staff met with the President of Primus Labs, Robert Stovicek, on November 7, 2011. Primus Labs is one of the nation’s largest third-party food safety auditors. Primus Labs conducts approximately 15,000 audits per year, primarily involving fresh produce facilities, for over 3,000 clients worldwide. A typical facility is audited once per year, and a Primus Labs audit results in a pass/fail determination, a score from 0-100%, and a report that lists any violations. Passing scores can differ greatly: a company can pass with comment, pass without comment, or pass with either major or minor compliance issues. A company fails if it has one “egregious” non-compliance or if it scores less than 80% overall. According to information provided by Primus Labs, the vast majority of the thousands of audits it conducts each yearreceive passing grades: 98.7% in 2010, 97.5% in 2009, and 98.1% in 2008.
Mr. Stovicek informed Committee staff that his company’s role is to conduct an impartial assessment of a client’s operations and provide its findings to the client. He stated that the audits are intended to assess whether the client’s operations are in compliance with current baseline industry standards—not to improve those standards or push a client towards best practices. Mr. Stovicek said that Primus Labs would “be a rogue element if they tried to pick winners and losers” by holding industry to higher standards. He also said that Primus Labs did not have the “expertise to determine which best practices should be pushed by the industry.”

Staff Briefing with Bio Food Safety
On January 6, 2012, Committee staff interviewed Jerry Walzel, the President of Bio Food Safety, by telephone. The purpose of the discussion was to verify several statements made about Mr. Walzel’s involvement with Jensen Farms and the 2010 audit he conducted at the Jensen Farms’ cantaloupe packing facility. Mr. Walzel indicated that he had little memory of the details surrounding the 2010 audit. He said he did not remember whether he did or did not provide advice to Jensen Farms following this audit.
Mr. Walzel also provided additional information on the 2011 audit. He explained why Jensen Farms was given a “superior” rating on this audit despite the fact that FDA officials indicated that the processing methods used at Jensen Farms were not consistent with FDA guidance. Mr. Walzel indicated that – consistent with Primus Labs policy – the audits only deducted from the score if a method or technique was inconsistent with FDA regulations; they did not deduct from the score if FDA guidance was not being followed. Mr. Walzel stated that Primus conducted a “check-off audit…and if it was not required, there were no deductions.” He stated that Bio Food Safety auditors were “roped in by regulation and Primus training,” and that “guidelines are opinions…. regulations are law.”
Additionally, he noted, “we are not supposed to be opinionated on this, we are supposed to go by FDA’s regulations…FDA should have mandated that you cannot sell cantaloupes that have not been sanitized.” While Dilorio noted on the front page of the audit that no anti- microbial solution was used in the wash water, he did not deduct any points based on this omission.

Conclusions
The recent multi-state Listeria outbreak involved cantaloupe produced by a single grower that was processed at its on-site packing facility. FDA has published the findings of its investigation into this matter and has posted a letter on its website reiterating the importance of growers and producers following its existing food safety guidance regarding the prevention of Listeria contamination. According to FDA, the outbreak would have likely been prevented if Jensen Farms had maintained its facilities in accordance with existing FDA guidance. In the case of cantaloupe processing, FDA has no specific regulations, only guidance. The guidance which Bio Food Safety did not consider in its audit represents the agency’s best and most timely advice on how processing should be handled.
FDA officials emphasized to Committee staff that the new processing equipment and the decision to use a packing and washing technique involving non-chlorinated water were two probable causes of the outbreak. Both of these significant changes were implemented at the packing facility in 2011.
According to Frontera Produce, in response to the outbreak, many major retailers have already instituted end-product testing of cantaloupe to identify Listeria, Salmonella and other pathogens. Frontera Produce officials also informed Committee staff that retailers and industry groups are studying the possible implementation of additional checks at different critical control points in the supply chain, including risk-based assessments and sample testing. Primus Labs noted, and FDA confirmed, that buyers will immediately start requiring auditors to take environmental swabs while auditing food facilities.
FDA does not regulate domestic third-party auditors and did not review the recent Jensen Farms audits while conducting its investigation. With respect to imported foods, the Food Safety Modernization Act requires that FDA establish an accreditation system and model auditing standards for third-party audits. According to industry observers, these standards will influence domestic auditing standards as well.
The cantaloupe industry, academics, and government officials, including representatives from FDA, are planning to attend an upcoming conference at the University of California, Davis on January 12, 2012, to examine the findings from the investigation of the Listeria outbreak, and to reduce the food safety risks associated with cantaloupe. The Committee will monitor that conference and its proposals for the prevention of further outbreaks.

Source House Energy and Commerce Commitee here

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms
  • services sprite Report on the Investigation of the Outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes in Cantaloupe at Jensen Farms

New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation

The Energy and Commerce Committee today released a new bipartisan staff report that details the findings from the committee’s investigation into the 2011 Listeria outbreak in cantaloupes grown and processed at Jensen Farms. The report is based on documents from and interviews with food safety officials at the Food and Drug Administration, Jensen Farms, Frontera Produce (the cantaloupe distributor), Primus Labs, and Bio Food Safety (third-party auditors of Jensen Farms).
“The recent outbreak of Listeria monocytogenes was the deadliest foodborne illness outbreak in over twenty-five years. The committee launched this investigation to provide helpful information to the FDA, growers, distributors, and other authorities in their efforts to improve the safety of our nation’s food supply. The committee will continue to monitor upcoming examinations of the Listeria outbreak and related proposals to help prevent another such tragedy,” said Chairman Fred Upton, Ranking Member Henry A. Waxman, Subcommittee Chairman Cliff Stearns, Ranking Member Diana DeGette, Subcommittee Chairman Joseph R. Pitts, Ranking Member Frank Pallone, Jr., and Rep. John D. Dingell.
The report provides insight into two probable causes of the introduction and spread of the Listeria contamination at Jensen Farms: the use of new processing equipment and the decision to implement a packing and washing technique involving water without added chlorine. The report also discusses recent third-party audits conducted at Jensen Farms and raises questions for the FDA and industry to review and address.
Source House Energy & Commerce Committee here

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
  • services sprite New Report Details Findings of Listeria Outbreak Investigation
Powered by WordPress | Compare Cell Phone Plans for All Carriers. | Thanks to Checking Account Rates, Best Bank Deals and UK Credit Cards